Home
Bio
Gallery
Reviews
Exhibitions

Art Books

Essays etc

Price List

Contact
Site Map
Links
Search

 
 

 

 

Originally posted on my blog, Wednesday, December 20, 2006

 

Cézanne: That Pedestal

 

 

This drawing happened the wrong way round. I was looking at a Cézanne still life and scribbled this diagram of the composition onto the back of an envelope. A few weeks later the diagram, lying on the desk, floated into consciousness. And all of a sudden, there it was: the reason for Cézanne‘s off-centre pedestal. It had to be off-centre or else he’d have had to repaint the fruit entirely, moving the main weight to the right. Instead he moved the pedestal to the left, under the centre of gravity. This was a kind of eureka moment for me, and I pass it on as a Christmas present to my (rare and much appreciated) readers.

Much has been written about Cézanne‘s composition, which somehow works in spite of oddities like this. Or rather, this way of looking at it helps to explain why his composition works so well. In this case, I'm proposing that the off-centre pedestal was not random or arbitrary, and that it was not a vague device “to strengthen the composition”; and further, that Cézanne was not consciously inventing a revolutionary school of painting. Rather, I'm saying that he moved the pedestal because everything on earth is subject to the law of gravity, and it suited his pictorial purpose better to move the pedestal rather than to move the fruit.

This completes the thought about Cézanne‘s pedestal which was originally mentioned in a discussion about the artist's intention.

(Edited Jan 10, 2007 -- rephrased and cut but the meaning not changed)
 

 

 



Home
Bio
Gallery
Reviews
Exhibitions

Art Books

Essays etc

Price List

Contact
Site Map
Links
Search

Thank you for visiting http://maryadamart.com/  in Trinidad and Tobago, West Indies

Copyright © Mary Adam 1999--2007; all rights reserved 
Last modified 05/10/2007